HRES 371 (113th Congress) · bill

HRES 371

113th Congress

Latest action 2013-10-04: DEBATE - Mr. Cole asked unanimous consent to modify the text of H.Res. 371 with the amendment at the desk. Agreed to without objection.

This bill number also appears in other loaded Congresses: 119th, 118th, 117th, 116th, 115th, 114th, 112th, 111th, 110th, 109th, 108th (bill numbers are reused each Congress, so these are different bills).

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 75) making continuing appropriations for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules; waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules; and for other purposes. bill

sponsor: Tom Cole
introduced: 2013-10-03
policy area: Congress
referred to: Rules Committee
cosponsors: 0
lobbying filings citing it: 0
money facing its subject: $34 to its sponsors
the record: no source link on the row

2 CRS legislative subjects, as written

House of Representatives, Legislative rules and procedure

Actions Cosponsors Lobbying Money facing it Votes

Actions: 13 on the record

Searching?

The record's own timeline, word for word, newest first. An action that names a committee links to it.

date	type	action, as written	committee
2013-10-03	IntroReferral	Introduced in House
2013-10-03	Committee	The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 113-242, by Mr. Cole.	House Committee on Rules
2013-10-03	Committee	The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 113-242, by Mr. Cole.	House Committee on Rules
2013-10-03	Calendars	Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 65.
2013-10-04	Floor	Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H6244-6252)
2013-10-04	Floor	DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 371.
2013-10-04	Floor	POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 371, the question was put on ordering the previous question, and by voice vote, the Chair announced that the yeas had prevailed. Ms. Slaughter demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2013-10-04	Floor	Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6252-6253)
2013-10-04	Floor	On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 223 - 184 (Roll no. 519). (consideration: CR H6252-6253)
2013-10-04	Floor	Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 222 - 183 (Roll No. 520).(text: CR H6244)
2013-10-04	Floor	On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 222 - 183 (Roll No. 520). (text: CR H6244)
2013-10-04	Floor	Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2013-10-04	Floor	DEBATE - Mr. Cole asked unanimous consent to modify the text of H.Res. 371 with the amendment at the desk. Agreed to without objection.

Cosponsors: 0

No cosponsors on the record for this bill.

Lobbying: 0 filings cite this bill

No lobbying filing in the years we collected cites this bill. That means we have not seen one, not that none exists; a filer may also describe a bill without a citation we can read. ‡ lobbying estimates

Money facing this bill

A giver's face is the list of subjects its organization lobbies Congress on, read from its own lobbying reports and spread by how often each subject comes up; a gift from someone who works there is spread the same way.

$34

measureMoney facing a bill's subject that reached its sponsors, version 3

subjectCongress

members counted1

members with a candidacy in 20141

this row as datathe stored row

from individual donors whose organizations lobby on Congress, the bill's policy area, reached the 1 member who sponsor or cosponsor it, in the 2014 cycle, more than 59% of Congress bills. From PACs whose sponsors lobby on it: $100, counted separately.

This is money tied to the bill's subject, not money given for or against the bill. It shows what an organization lobbies on, not what position it takes, and no gift is tied to a bill.

The members it reached, and who gave it

Tom Cole sponsor, Republican-OK
$34
measureMoney by the subjects its givers lobby on, version 3
this row as datathe stored row
- Filed
  PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
  organization as filedPRESERVATION TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
  employer as filedPRESERVATION TECHNOLOGIES
  where the face comes fromits own lobbying reports
  its face and filingsopen the evidence
  $33
- Filed
  DUKE ENERGY
  organization as filedDUKE ENERGY
  employer as filedDUKE ENERGY
  where the face comes fromits own lobbying reports
  its face and filingsopen the evidence
  $1

The organizations are each member's three largest on this subject. A group of organizations is shown by name only after a person has reviewed it.

Money facing a bill's subject that reached its sponsors, version 3 · ‡ self-reported text ‡ small donors invisible ‡ lobbying estimates

Votes: 2 roll calls tied to this bill by the chambers' own documents

Tallies are the chambers' own published numbers. ‡ votes, not motives

date	chamber	question	result	yeas	nays	record
2013-10-04	house	On Ordering the Previous Question	Passed	223	184	the chamber's document
2013-10-04	house	On Agreeing to the Resolution	Passed	222	183	the chamber's document

Coverage: bills are loaded for Congresses 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119. We have not collected a Congress missing from that list, so its bills do not show here even though they exist. Lobbying citations cover the LDA years we collected; votes cover the loaded roll-call files. ‡ correlation, not purchase ‡ lobbying estimates ‡ votes, not motives